In July, August and September of 2016, the owner of the rights to the film “The Cell” filed copyright infringement lawsuits against hundreds alleged BitTorrent downloaders in California, Maryland, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Virginia and Washington. The federal courts gave them permission to subpoena the names and addresses of the defendants, and the internet service providers are now sending notification letters to subscribers warning them that their identities are being sought by the plaintiff. Some people are already at the stage where they’re receiving letters directly from the attorneys for Cell Film Holdings, LLC, the company that holds the rights to bring copyright infringement cases for the film.
Most people are worried and afraid when they receive one of these letters. There are a few things you should know before you read any further:
1. This is a manageable problem.
2. You have good options, and you can choose what happens next.
3. Getting sued for copyright infringement of a single film is not going to ruin you financially.
4. If you act sooner rather than later when you receive a letter from your internet provider, you can avoid having your name disclosed to the plaintiff and can avoid having your name made public in the case.
5. Attorney Erin Russell has handled more than a thousand BitTorrent defense cases involving a single film being downloaded. Some of those cases were settled, and some were dismissed outright. Your case can be worked out without it affecting your credit or involving public records. If you act sooner rather than later, your name can be kept out of the public record.
6. Everything will be ok.
Having said all of that, if you received a letter from your internet provider regarding one of the “Cell” lawsuits, we can help. Attorney Erin Russell has helped thousands of accused downloaders to either litigate or settle their copyright infringement cases. You can call any time and have a free telephone consultation with Erin at 312-900-9723. She has 12 years of litigation experience, and is one of the most experienced BitTorrent defense attorneys in the country. We always offer a free, no obligation consultation. If you receive a letter about one of these cases, it is best to act quickly. You can save yourself a great deal of stress and a great deal of money by acting sooner rather than later. We charge a reasonable flat fee for all BitTorrent defense cases, and offer discounts to students, senior citizens and members of the military. Call and get a free consultation right away. Erin will give you all of the information you need to make a decision about whether to settle or to litigate, and how best to use your resources to take care of your case.
The following cases filed by Cell Film Holdings, LLC are currently pending:
California:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Doe – 3:2016-cv-02289
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Doe – 3:2016-cv-02234
Maryland:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 1:2016-cv-03043
Ohio:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-02265
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 2:2016-cv-00878
Oregon:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01646
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01526
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01647
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01388
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01525
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01441
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01486
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01487
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01440
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01484
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-01387
Pennsylvania:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 2:2016-cv-04879
Texas:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 4:2016-cv-02781
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 4:2016-cv-02628
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 4:2016-cv-02544
Virginia:
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-00750
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 3:2016-cv-00749
Washington
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 2:2016-cv-01180
Cell Film Holdings, LLC v. Does – 2:2016-cv-01091